Neil Postman Essay -- essays research papers

Throughout the span of the past few weeks I pick out traversed the globe, visiting several countries and regions, only to realize that although new methods develop, language as a way of expressing iodins self has remained the most effective. Despite this fact, language still has its pitfalls. Neil Postman, in his essay &8220Defending Against the Indefensible, outlines seven concepts that can be used to aid a student in better understanding the language as a means of communication. He describes how modern teaching methods leave a student vulnerable to the &8220prejudices of their elders, further stating that a good teacher must always be skeptical. He urges teachers of all subjects to break free from traditional teachings as well as &8220linguistical tyranny His first principle regards the process of definition. As I sit in an every day classroom I notice several things. Many, if not all student simply nod their heads while a teacher explains, be it a theory in Math, or a formula i n Science. Not once have I encountered a student willing to shake up their hand and question the definition, or meaning that a teacher has rambled off to them. Neil Postman states his feelings on this best when he writes, &8220 It is a form of stupidity when to possess without reflection someone else&8217s definition. He wants people to realize that definitions are not god given, and that to question the bindingity is acceptable. Upon looking in a dictionary at any word you will see that all have several meanings. The same whitethorn apply to our lives, while one definition may apply to you another may not.The ability to question a definition is a crucial part of communication. For example in the practice of law a case might call for someone to define the freedom of press, and that very definition may mean two completely unalike things to two different people. Postman&8217s first principle was one that I feel needed to be addressed. Too often our teachers impose the same defini tion they learned, valid, or not. If one is not allowed to defend a definition, especially an unjust one, then communication becomes more difficult. &8220All the knowledge one could ever attain is by asking questions, so logically these questions should be properly formed. Postman&... ...A metaphor, used as a communication skill, is best described in a political way. Think of Reagan&8217s Voodoo economics, or Bill Clinton building a bridge to the 21st century. Politicians can easily scam an ignorant voter, should one not understand a metaphor. For example Clinton refers to building a bridge, but does not tell us with which tools he intends to build it with. This particular concept is valid alone for the above reason. Whether you are talking to a teacher or watching television, metaphors need to understand. The fifth concept is that of reification. This means confusing words with things. We falsely associate simple words with things they don&8217t even resemble. This occurs many ti mes when we communicate. Sometimes used to exaggerate the importance of a detail when grave a story, or trying to increase the appeal of consumer goods. Postman wants reification to be taught in school so students may see the inner whole kit and caboodle of it. Reification is a very potent thing in every day life, and the study of reification in school is an admirable thing. Students should be do wary of advertising gimmicks.